Thursday, April 26, 2012

Islip Town Budget Task Force Finds: The Devil is in the "Details"


 $26 Million Dollar Deficit Projected for 2013

Putting the blame on the economic downturn, a lack of financial leadership and wasteful spending by the Town of Islip, the "Budget Task Force" predicted a $26 million dollar budget deficit for the year 2013.

Town of Islip Supervisor, Thomas Croci plans to "Swing for the fences and lay down a bunt.", when dealing with the budget shortfall revealed in a report issued today, at a press conference in Islip Town Hall.  Changes will be subtle in some cases- drastic in others, but all will attempt to chip away at the financial deficit while keeping the Town's sterling bond rating.

Supervisor Tom Croce speaks at Press Conference

Former Supervisor Phil Nolan was at the helm when the Islip economy fell off the proverbial cliff. According to Steven Flotteron, Islip Senior Town Councilman and Chairman of the Budget Task Force  
the Town will no longer kick the problem down the road.  Complete with charts and documents Supervisor Tom Croce, Mr. Flotteron and other Town Board members insisted it was not politics, but simple mathematics that was at issue here when the new Republican administration was asked by someone in the crowd if the Task Force was bipartisan.

The last administration simply spent more money than they were taking in.

Islip's fund balance rose from $42.3 million in 2002 until 2007, when the general fund balance was at its' peak of $75.4 million dollars.

From 2007 until 2011 the balance was $49.1 million...during the same time period Islip Town revenues rose from $76.7 million to a peak of $89.7 million dollars in 2006.

Since then, 2007 to 2011 there has been a sharp decline in revenues to $71.9 million in 2011.

This $26 million dollar deficit is the equivalent of 20% of the Town's entire budget and 85% of the Town's entire payroll.

Councilman Steve Flotteron,  released the preliminary findings of the report with other task force members, Dr. Edward T. Gullason and William Mannix who were instrumental in putting together the findings of the report according, to Mr. Flotteron.  They outlined how the Town's finances turned upside down.
Steve Flotteron points to deficit figures

Some of the forces were beyond the control of the Town, such as:  reduction in property taxes, due to foreclosures and problems from the burst of the housing bubble, the general economic downturn which resulted in lower sales tax revenues as well as higher unemployment, reduced individual spending and curtailed corporate investments, according to Mr. Flotteron and Mr. Mannix.

Other spending issues were the direct result of mismanagement by the former administration, including failure to trim spending when the financial distress was obvious.  Prior years surpluses were exploited to balance the budgets and instead of making tough decisions spending increased from 2007 through 2011, the tenure of Mr. Nolan's administration.

Mr. Nolan was recently touted for the job of running Suffolk OTB, which is already in financial distress.  If Mr. Nolan does for OTB what he did during his time as Supervisor of Islip, then it is "chalk" OTB is in for a bumpy ride.


Additionally, the state pension payments totaling $8 Million dollars were deferred by the Nolan administration until 2013 and decisions to issue bonds for short term borrowing were never made.



Cesspool Trucks and Street Sweepers..."The Devil's in the Detailing"


During Phil Nolan's watch there was detailing of Town of Islip trucks that are used as street sweepers and cesspool vacuum cleaners.  This was pointed to as an example not only of wasting thousands of dollars, but of the lack of common fiscal sense that would lead anyone to hand detail a work truck and charge the taxpayers over $3,500 dollars just to send it back to the street to get dirty the next day.
The vendor payments to "Polished to Perfection" in Bohemia, show over twenty charges of $150 or more for polishing faded panels on the Town street sweepers approved by what appears to be a signature next to the title "Dep.Comm".


Trucks such as these were "detailed" at a cost of thousands of dollars to taxpayers.


The Town's information technology division spent $97,000  on software contracts for computer-software and data services that were never installed and never used.  Add to that, the Town, under Mr. Nolan purchased 100 computers that had the wrong operating system, requiring two employees months of work to make the necessary adjustments so the computers could be used by the Town.

As previously reported by Freelance Investigations, in 2009 Mr. Nolan gave raises to various executives while simultaneously laying off over 40 municipal workers.

The Department of Public Works was directed to use outside mechanics to repair Town vehicles when the same brake job that cost $1,000 could have been done by an Islip Fleet Service mechanic "working out of title" for a pay differential of just $36, according to the Budget Review Task Force.

This report is just the tip of the iceberg according to Mr. Flotteron and their task now is to find ways that services can be economized without the effect on the public wherever and whenever possible and without having to raise taxes.

To accomplish this, each Board member is a liason to a specific Town Department and will look for specific ways to save money.  If a job is cheaper to farm out, it will be.  If the municipal workers can do a job more economically, then it will stay in house.

An example given was the Industrial Development Agency closings that formerly were given to Huntington Town Councilman, Mark Cuthbertson, a good friend of Mr. Nolan.  The Town took the work back into the Town Attorney's office (where it had always been before the Nolan administration) and not only is the work now done for a fraction of the cost, the Town makes money from the closings as well.


                                               A Fine Mess of Parking Tickets


According to the report, Islip Town failed to collect fines on 12,000 parking tickets issued during the last three years.  The Town under Mr. Nolan, had reduced staff for processing of the tickets at the same time they increased issuance of tickets and so there is a "closet full" of uncollected tickets with penalties totaling an estimated $1.5 million dollars, according to the report.

That number may not be as high as estimated if the "illegal tickets" Mr. Nolan's Public Safety Chief; Larry O'Leary and his crew, issued are identified and dismissed... as they should be.
See Freelance Investigations:
 http://freelance-documentdrivennews.blogspot.com/2011_09_01_archive.html


In that article last year  Freelance Investigations found documents showing Mr. O’Leary allegedly issued over 100 falsified parking permits in 2010 and 2011 to persons living within two blocks of the Islip Town water park.  The permits  appeared official as they had a bar code and the Town seal and allegedly Mr. O’Leary’s signature on them.





 Mr. O'Leary's signature was on the illegal permits. If the signature is not Mr. O'Leary's, or if it was not forged and was used with his knowledge and/or permission (as a memo sent to Susan Pontillo, would indicate) the permits would still be illegal, because there was no resolution by the Town Board authorizing them.
Another problem with the permits was that the bar code that was used on the parking permits was from a book ISBN number.  


Islip Town never made a resolution authorizing either the permits or the parking signs. Public Safety officers allegedly put the signs up in the middle of the night on telephone poles and trees within a two block radius of the water park.  This would force most people to pay the $10 parking fee in the Town owned marina lot or get a ticket.  How many of the tickets that were unpaid are these  illegal tickets, issued without proper authorization?  That remains to be seen.

Putting signs on telephone poles is against Town ordinances and LIPA rules.


"No Parking" signs were placed on telephone poles...under Islip Town Code (Article 29), it is illegal to post signs of all types on trees and telephone poles.





THE FOLLOWING IS A COPY OF THE REPORT


 Town of Islip Budget Review Task Force Report 2012

SUMMARY
Research by Islip Town’s Budget Task Force has uncovered various factors that have resulted in a potential $26 million budget deficit in 2013. These include economic factors resulting from the Recession that reduced employment, mortgage-tax receipts, and business in general, a failure by the prior administration to curtail spending at a time when revenues were declining, a reliance on surplus funds to keep taxes from rising, and careless spending for top employee raises, unnecessary equipment, technology never implemented and a failure to collect parking violation fines. The Task Force will seek solutions to these and other issues that may arise.

THE TASK FORCE
Soon after taking office, Town of Islip Supervisor Tom Croci discerned that the Town would incur a $26 million budget deficit in 2013. The Town Board subsequently asked Councilman Steve Flotteron to chair a task force that would determine how the Town’s financial condition changed so dramatically and to make recommendations on how to solve the shortfall.


A $26 million deficit is the equivalent of 20 percent of the entire Town budget and 85 percent of the Town’s entire payroll (or the entire general fund payroll).

Before the Task Force could begin its work, however, it first had to identify the causes of the current budget pressures and how the Town’s financial condition changed so dramatically over the past decade.

FUND BALANCES, REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
Islip’s fund balance rose from $42.3 million in 2002 to a peak of $75.4 million in 2007. Since then, the trend has been in decline, to $49.1 million in 2011.

During this same period, Town revenues rose from $76.7 million to a peak of $89.7 million in 2006. Since then revenues declined sharply and in 2011 totaled $71.9.

The Town’s expenses remained steadily below revenues from 2002 to 2006. Expenses in 2002 were $71.7 million and rose steadily through 2007 to $89 million, when they first exceeded revenues by $3.1 million. Since 2007, although expenses trended lower, they exceeded revenues in every year through 2011, when the gap was $12.7 million. That gap continues to widen and the proposed level of expenditures, put forth in 2011, cannot be supported.

THE CAUSES
How did the Town’s finances turn upside down?

Economic forces beyond Town Hall’s control significantly shaped the Town’s financial health.  Core Town services are funded by the general operating fund, which relies heavily upon property taxes, mortgage tax receipts and franchise fees.  These resources have been battered over the last four years as the Recession diminished property values, forced home foreclosures and curtailed home sales. Moreover, unemployment has reduced individual spending and corporate investment.

Additionally, in each of the last four years, the Town has experienced structural budget deficits in which ongoing revenues were not sufficient to meet ongoing expenditures. Regrettably, the prior administration did not thoughtfully address these deficits by selectively reducing expenditures and services and establishing more efficient operating models. The looming financial distress was ignored. Recommendations to the prior administration by the Town Comptroller to either trim expenses or increase revenues went unheeded and prior years’ surpluses were exploited. In the 2012 budget, 17.3 million dollars of surplus funds was earmarked to balance the budget.

Significantly, difficult decisions were postponed, perhaps in the hope that the economy might right itself in the near future.  This, of course, has not yet occurred.

In addition, state pension payments totaling $8 million had been deferred by the prior administration budget until 2013 and decisions were made not to issue bonds for short-term borrowing.

Spending, in particular, was unwisely done in the last 5 years.  Among the most egregious examples include:

* In 2011, the Town Department of Public Works spent $3,545 to cosmetically detail street sweepers and two vacuum trucks (used to clean out storm drains). Operators of the equipment were not permitted time during the course of their work day to address the maintenance and cleaning of the equipment, resulting in more down time, more breakdowns and more money spent on parts and cleaning.
* The Town Public Safety Department over past years spent  thousands of dollars cosmetically detailing its vehicles.
* Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent on paving equipment that was never used by the Department of Public Works because of poor suitability to operating conditions in Islip.
* The Town’s Information Technology Division spent $97,000 on contracts for computer-software and data services that were never installed and never used.
* The Town purchased 100 personal computers with the wrong operating systems, requiring two months of work by two full-time town employees to make the necessary changes.
* In 2009, the prior Supervisor gave out raises to various top executives while at the same time he laid off 40 employees.
* In 2007, the Department of Public Works was directed to use outside mechanics to repair Town vehicles to make up for reduced staff and reduced overtime.  One manager cited the private cost of a brake job at $1,000, while an Islip Fleet Services mechanic working out of title could have done the same for a pay differential of just $36.

In addition:
The Town failed to collect fines on 12,000 parking tickets issued during the past three years due in part to increased ticketing at a time of staff reductions involving those who processed the tickets. Fines on unpaid tickets generally double every 30, 60 or 90 days they remain unanswered. Some individual outstanding tickets total as much as $770 if unpaid. A backlog of unpaid tickets, totaling an estimated $1.5 million, remains outstanding.

Actions that could have been taken in previous years’ budget cycles weren't and the result has heavily burdened the budget for 2013.

The Budget Task Force intends to cast a wide net to find ways for the Town to continue delivering services while figuring out a way to deal with the deficit, all without raising taxes. Tough decisions will be required to solve these issues.






Sunday, April 22, 2012

2012 LONG ISLAND EARTH SUMMIT

April 22  is Earth Day.
What is Your Carbon Footprint?



This week on April 17, the Citizens Campaign for the Environment and Brookhaven National Laboratory held a combined  EARTH SUMMIT at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) in an effort to combine " Good science and good advocacy to advance a 2102 Earth Agenda for Long Island".

Complete with tours of the BNL Solar Farm and individual workshops with distinguished experts discussing some pressing issues for Long Island the summit's  topics included,  the need to protect the Island's estuaries, rivers, bays and waterways and especially the need for protecting the potable water supply while also delving into potential future energy solutions.

Solar Panels at Brookhaven National Lab

Solar Panels Appear as Water From the Air



The conference was an all day affair, beginning for many with a tour of the highly successful solar farm,  which supplies power directly into the LIPA Grid.

Back at BNL's Berkner Hall and conference center there was a choice of several workshops in the early afternoon:


Toxic Tides:  What's Lurking in our Bays
with Dr. Chris Gobler, Professor, SUNY Stonybrook


Long Island's Energy Future:  Go Renewables!
 Meeting Our Energy Challenges
      100% Renewables=100% Possible
with Gordian Raacke, Executive Director Renewable  Energy Long Island (reLI)


Electrification and Long Island with Dr. Gerald M. Stokes, Associate Laboratory Director for Global & Regional Solutions, BNL

Later in the day the choice of workshops included:

Hydrogeology of Long Island:  Groundwater Threats and Contamination
-What Can We Do About It?
The Hydrogeology of Long Island 
with Dick Cartwright Hydrologist, US Geological Survey, New York Water Science Center
Drinking Water Threats and Solutions
with Maureen Dolan Murphy, Executive Programs Manager, Citizens Campaign for the Environment

and

Smart Planning:  Preserving Open Space, Our Natural World and Growing Long Island
with Eric Alexander, Executive Director of Vision Long Island
        David Calone, Chair of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and
        Adrienne Esposito, Executive Director, Citizens Campaign for the Environment
Informative Discussions at the Earth Summit



  WHAT ARE LONG ISLAND'S GREATEST ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES?


After the workshops there was a panel discussion moderated by Maureen Dolan Murphy ( Citizens Campaign for the Environment).  Ms. Dolan Murphy posed that question to a varied group of panelists including, Eric Alexander, Dave Calone, Richard Cartwright, Adrienne Esposito, Gordian Raacke, Dr. Gerald Stokes and Kara Hahn; Suffolk County Legislator, Neal Lewis; Executive Director of Sustainability Institute at Molloy College, John McNally; Rauch Foundation and Peter Scully; Regional Director, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation.



With a little over three minutes for each panelist to answer the question of what are Long Island's greatest environmental challenges- their perspectives varied.

Gordian Raake (Renewable Energy Long Island) spoke about the rise of sea level and the effects of storm surges on all water edge properties.

Dr. Stokes discussed global and regional solutions being worked on at BNL and was particularly concerned of our need to be aware of climate change and its challenges, not wanting a "death of a thousand cuts" by ignoring the effects already being felt.
Droughts, fires and a rise in sea level could change Long Island forever.  Climate zones are already being changed by the Horticultural Society.

Neal Lewis (Executive Director of the Sustainability Institute of Molloy College) cited a specific goal of a decrease in Carbon Dioxide by 80% by 2050, with a more aggressive approach to have that goal reached by 2020.  Professor Lewis said the biggest challenge confronting our society is "politics".
"The political system is not working to protect our ecosystem."

David Calone, another panelist (Jove Equity Partners, a venture capital firm) who also sits on the LIPA Board of Trustees, said "Policy needs to change.  There needs to be an integration of agriculture and economic development."  Mr. Calone advocated for a redemption of the Pine Barrens credits and a push to finance sewers wherever possible.  At the present time Pine Barrens credits are not being redeemed or retired.

Eric Alexander (Vision Long Island) said that "Trying to retrofit our downtowns, with housing, energy and transportation is the goal." There are 15 Regional Plans currently being considered and 73 local plans are also still alive.  The problem is the banks aren't financing and SEQRA regulations may be too strong, according to Mr. Alexander.  There is a disconnect between Regional and Local Planning that needs to be addressed, he added.

Adrienne Esposito, the host and Executive Director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment (CCE) also gave her response as a panelist answering that the real challenge is to educate the public. To dispel the fear and ignorance and make people realize that the drinking water quality is degrading.  There was MTBE, a gasoline additive found in 330 test wells.  That is just a sample of one toxic carcinogen, there are many more found each year and sometimes the solution is blending good water to bad water to lower the amount in a given well that has exceeded maximum contamination levels according to government standards.  Getting this message out is the challenge Ms. Esposito and the CCE are tackling with conferences such as this Earth Summit.

Richard Cartwright, (U.S. Geological Survey) said the water supply itself was his greatest concern.
Since 1986 he has been involved with water-resource investigations of groundwater quantity and quality throughout Long Island and New York City. According to Mr. Cartwright, the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) sees peak pumping use in the AM in the Spring and Summer.

Suffolk County Legislator Kara Hahn, who also Chairs the SC Legislature's Environmental Committee
pledged to bring back the information to the rest of the Suffolk County Legislature and to continue to protect Long Island's water supply by oversight and education.

Peter Scully (Regional Director DEC) said there is a real need to expand waste treatment facilities for Long Island but in the economic climate this is difficult. In the DEC also, the staffing is down and resources at the DEC are at a premium.  NIMBY'ism (Not In My Backyard)
is a real challenge for things to get accomplished and there is a need to balance development and environmental protection and a true need for the general public to look at things in a more long term way instead of just dealing with short range problems.  With the general public "out of sight out of mind", according to Mr. Scully.

John McNally, (Raush Foundation) was emphatic about the need to create a protection plan and an agency whose sole charge is to protect the aquifer.  Once again the idea of balance was put forth, in this case the challenges of climate change balanced against economic growth and the need to balance political courage with an informed citizenry.

David Spritzen (Long Island Progressive Coalition) said that on the state level Long Island receives only 3.5% of Federal waste water treatment dollars.  He said there was the need to leverage private investments and used the Caithness plant as an example of the need to use private capital to create public utilities.  More public announcements and involvement is the key, according to Mr. Spritzen.


A short question and an answer period was followed by the keynote speaker of the day and the topic was "Why We Should Leave Small Fish in the Sea."

                                Little Fish are Big in the Ocean Ecosystem

Ellen Pikitch, Professor and Executive Director Institute for Ocean Conservation Science was the keynote speaker.  Dr. Pikitch's research focuses on the interconnectedness of the oceans and the idea that species and habitats cannot be managed successfully in isolation.  Dr. Pikitch is on the forefront in work ranging from basic scientific innovations to domestic and international policy change- with the goal of improving ocean conservation worldwide.

Dr. Pikitch is the Chairperson of the new Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force, a team of policy experts and top scientists from around the world who will address the escalating environmental dilemma of the depletion of forage fish-(bait fish or small schooling fish), a crucial species in the food web.   These little fish such as sardines, anchovies, sand eels, frill and herring are food for other fish, mammals and seabirds, and are used for fish oil capsules for humans and in pet food (fish meal) as a filler.  Their loss signals the depletion of many other species including entire fish, marine mammals and seabird colonies.  Marine life is disappearing.

According to Dr. Pikitch, these fish are worth twice as much in the water where they feed the larger fish and keep the ocean's ecosystem in proper balance. Since these fish usually live in dense schools, they are relatively easy to catch in nets and so the recommendation of the Lenfest Task Force is to lower the catches by half- and tailor the recommendations for the needs of specific ecosystems.

Forage fish are 37% of the world's total marine catch: 31.5 million tons per year.  90% of the catch is processed or reduced to make fish meal and fish oil and for aqua and agriculture and industrial purposes.
On salmon farms: It takes 3-5 lbs of fish meal to create one lb of salmon
On tuna farms: It takes  20 lbs of fish meal to create one lb of tuna

These fish colonies are very vulnerable to collapse as their own food sources (plankton etc.) are highly variable and sensitive to the environment.  Collapses have occurred:
 In the 1950"s....California Sardines
           1970's....Peruvian Anchovies
           1970's...Namibian Sardines
           1990's....Japanese Sardines

Prior to 1953, the "Guano Island Birds" whose diet included forage fish, created fertilizer used in agriculture.  The birds were cut out of the process in 1953 and the fish were taken directly from the sea causing the seabird population to rapidly decline and the numbers have never recovered.

There are success stories such as in the Barents Sea, North of Norway and Russia.  Capelin fish supplies were severely depleted, and regulations were put into place so that if the biomass (total amount of fish) falls below 200,000 tons..then fishing is prohibited.  Capelin stocks are now abundant.

Case studies have improved scientists' understanding of the causes of collapses and Dr. Pikitch and her colleagues' approach to the problem includes conducting workshops, making site visits, teaching both the theory and practice, conducting case studies and collecting data on forage fish and predators.

Dr. Pikitch's research also focuses on advancing knowledge of vulnerable and ecologically important marine mammals, such as sharks whose populations are declining due to destructive commercial fishing practices and sturgeon whose prized caviar eggs put them at extreme risk.  Thanks to the efforts of Dr. Pikitch and the research of the Institute, international trade restrictions on great white sharks have been
instituted and the beluga sturgeon is now listed on the Endangered Species list and there is a U.S. ban on wild beluga caviar. Dr. Pikitch and her team developed sophisticated DNA-based forensic techniques to help identify shark species from a small piece of tissue, even from a dried fin.  Those techniques are now being used by enforcement agents to detect and prosecute illegal sales of shark fins and allowed Dr. Pikitch and her team to compile the first global estimate of the number of sharks killed for the shark fin trade.

Dr. Pikitch recommends a tiered management approach, focus on the predators both spatial and temporal and to cut forage fishing in half which leaves twice as many fish in the ocean in many ecosystems.  The key for scientists is an ecosystem-based management where the benefits reduce collapses and increase the catch of bigger fish.  Dr. Pikitch will attend the "Committee on Fisheries Conference" to be held in Rome this July.

Many Long Island Environmental Groups had tables at the conference and handed out literature, answered questions, got petitions signed and generally added to the quality and tone of the day.


                                                    DONT RUSH TO FLUSH

Citizens Campaign for the Environment were the co-host of the Summit.  They are very interested in stopping the improper disposal of pharmaceuticals.

    DO NOT FLUSH OLD, UNUSED MEDICINES DOWN THE TOILET

CCE wants people to know that according to the U.S. Geological Survey, the nations waterways have been testing positive for trace amounts of pharmaceutical contaminants with an estimated 41 million Americans drinking water from a source containing trace amounts of hormones, antibiotics, steroids and contraceptives in 80% of the water tested since 2002.

Long Island is a sole source aquifer region, which means residents rely on the groundwater for 100% of their drinking water.  Contamination of the groundwater by pharmaceuticals disposed of by flushing them negatively impacts public health and the environment.  (CCE brochure)
Groups who left literature or had a table and identified their websites would be happy to have you visit them to obtain more information on a variety of topics.  Their hope is that you get involved in any way possible so just press the link and it will take you directly to their web site.

Citizens Campaign For The Environment

Peconic Estuary Program

Sierra Club

Some notable groups present:

Citizens Campaign for the Environment:  www.citizenscampaign.org
Brookhaven National Laboratory: www.bnl.gov
Long Island Sierra Club: www.lisierraclub.org
Peconic Baykeeper: www.peconicbaykeeper.org
Peconic Estuary Program: www.PeconicEstuary.org
GROUP for the East End: www.eastendenvironment.org
Earth Share of New York: www.earthshareny.org
Group for the South Fork: www.groupforthesouthfork.org

The Cesspool Project which is a coordinated effort to find environmental solutions to the problems of malfunctioning cesspools on Long Island and their intrusion into the sole water source aquifer has been a joint effort of the following five groups representing 12 municipalities on Long Island.

Friends of the Bay (Oyster Bay): www.friendsofthebay.org
The Town of Oyster Bay: www.oysterbaytown.com/
Manhasset Bay Protection Committee: www.manhassetbayprotectioncommittee.org/
Oyster Bay/ Cold Spring Harbor Protection Committee: www.friendsofthebay.org/ 
Hempstead Harbor Protection Committee: www.hempsteadharbor.org/


Suffolk County Water Authority: www.scwa.com/
Vision Long Island:  www.visionlongisland.org
LIPA: www.lipower.org

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

GUEST EDITORIAL ON THE CARMANS RIVER PLAN...by MaryAnn Johnston


If the Carmans River is to be truly protected and flow clean in perpetuity...it must first be freed from some elected officials seeking to ride its currents to high places. More importantly, it must also be free from high intensity development and all the pollution of air, soil and, water emanating from such development; not only within but beyond its watershed boundaries. This is a future for the Carmans River Watershed and Brookhaven Town that many residents will support for our precious 'Jewel of the Isle".

And the real friends of the River are truly easy to find...they are publicly out front, members of the Brookhaven Town Council, and are found among those who showed up by the hundreds to voice their opposition to a plan that purported to "Save the River", while putting in place the very plan that could destroy it along with the entire rest of the town.

But the Carmans Four, elected officials and servants of the people, stood up as a strong bastion against the back room deals, the powerful special interests, the big money, the phony preservation plans and the seemingly endless political spin and streams of false and misleading information. Yes, Four members of the Brookhaven Town Board led an effort to block a scientifically indefensible plan that could not possibly achieve the worthy goal of "saving the river". 

The plan was hatched over many months, with untold number of secret closed back-room sessions, unannounced and unrecorded meetings between developers and special interest groups, and big deals for high density development that threatened to change Brookhaven communities forever. Oh yes, there was some small efforts to appear open, truly little more than mere lip service, There was no meaningful or cooperative community outreach efforts from planners, LIBI developers or even the misguided environmentalists. In fact, it now seems that the plan may have been used by some to identify areas secretly slated for multi-family development and get a big "jump start" on purchasing specifically identified parcels or perhaps setting the eligibility table for new Pine Barren credits ...so very convenient?

The thankfully thwarted plan would have served two big special interests goals: making it appear that developers were actually working to help "Save the River"; while also creating unencumbered rights to build thousands of multi-family rental housing all across Brookhaven. The need for such housing remains in question, considering there are some 20,000 foreclosures and abandoned homes lining one neighborhood after another throughout much of Brookhaven Town. 

Our young people want good jobs, that is their first order of priority, not a luxury apartment. Transferring development rights from the Carmans or any other watershed into more densely populated and stressed areas of the town was simply a non-starter. Allowing developers to by-pass Code requirements and avoid zone changes, and elected accountability and public review, by giving them the right to build multi-family housing in specific areas and council districts without regard to schools, 1st responders, or even the necessary infrastructure outside our downtowns was totally untenable.

Yes the Carmans Four are proponents for "Saving the River" -- Steve Fiore-Rosenfeld, Daniel Panico, Tim Mazzei and Connie Kepert -- each raised multiple serious objections, not only about the science in particular, but also how areas in the town where thousands of rental housing might be built or where transfer of development and property was to be located were selected. They stood firm against Supervisor Mark Lesko's plan developed by special interests and instead offered a viable alternative to save this most important natural resource. They also agreed to consider (if necessary), a plan to provide 'next-generation' housing. Clearly, any plan that is bad for our residents and communities must also be a bad plan for the River and the Town. 

These Four worked together and identified the plan's failures, recognized the failings of such an exclusionary process and questioned the findings and statements that high-density housing couldn't add any school children. Especially in a suburban environment, they recognized that without critical input from our school districts, communities and others...and not developers...the plan simply could not be supported.

After more than two and half-hours of seemingly endless verbal gymnastics, Supervisor Lesko was forced to withdraw the resolution to 'accept' the obviously flawed plan. Still, even presented with another alternative to "save the river", Supervisor Lesko and Council members Bonner and Walsh simply refused to allow any other process to displace the Carmans River Development Plan or to even permit the beginning of a public discussion on an "alternative vision".

Photo by MaryAnn Johnston
Notwithstanding, an alternative resolution will be presented at the April 24th Town Board meeting and the Four Heroes of the Carmans will stand ready to vote to move real preservation efforts forward.... with or without the support of the remaining three council members.

Finally, there are Four council members who actually listened to the community, carefully read the documents, (many released at the 11th hour), have now offered an "Alternate Vision" for moving ahead...one that will not include the destruction of any one area or the rest of the town. These Four are to be congratulated for their courage.

Now together we can look forward to a real Preservation Plan.  One that considers all factors provides avenues for meaningful community input and contribution and can be supported by all stakeholders, residents and communities...and not just special interests.

Hopefully, the seriously flawed plan that by-passed all local community-based planning principles as well as elected accountability does at last appear to 'lie dead in the water'.
MaryAnn Johnston
President, ABCO (Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Organizations Inc)
Chair: Land Use and Environment Committee